Data Security & Compliance to ensure success and reduce risk.

You found the perfect data governance software. It promised automated lineage, seamless policy enforcement, and enterprise-wide data visibility. You signed the contract, rolled it out—and six months later, adoption is low, your team’s frustrated, and compliance gaps still linger. Here’s what that mistake is costing you, and how to avoid it.

Choosing a data governance tool without a strategy is like buying a CRM with no sales process. The tool might look powerful, but without clarity on how you’ll use it—or why—it will sit idle, fail to deliver value, and frustrate your team. In a landscape full of vendors promising “end-to-end governance,” the real question isn’t which tool is best. It’s which tool is right for you.

If your data isn’t governed, it’s risky. If it isn’t high quality, it’s useless. If it’s neither—it’s dangerous. Many organizations make the mistake of lumping data quality programs and the data governance framework into the same category. But they’re not the same.

Most banks think data governance is a checkbox. A set of policies. Maybe a SharePoint folder. It’s not. And what you don’t see—your blind spots—gets you fined. Find the blind spots, fix them, and build governance that actually governs. Before the OCC makes you do it.

As banks grow—especially those approaching or passing the $50 billion asset threshold—regulators sharpen their focus on vendors. Not just who they are, but what they access. How they handle your data. Whether they meet your security and compliance standards. It’s not just about what your vendors do. It’s about how well you manage them.

Strong cybersecurity won’t save you from governance failures. And great governance doesn’t matter if your data is garbage. These are distinct disciplines. Each critical. Each under a microscope. If you think locking down systems checks the compliance box—you’re wrong. And that misunderstanding is costing banks time, money, and credibility.